summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/txt/shower.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'txt/shower.txt')
-rw-r--r--txt/shower.txt56
1 files changed, 56 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/txt/shower.txt b/txt/shower.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..83c104c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/txt/shower.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+ How many outcomes are there to a shower?
+
+ We have to set our scope and threshold. You're probably
+ thinking that there is one outcome: getting clean.
+ However, there are infinite outcomes to any event if
+ you're not careful.
+
+ First, I will limit the observation to the instant the
+ shower is done. What if I don't? If you count the process,
+ then every footstep you take in the shower will impact
+ how the shower goes on a microscopic level that, with
+ just the right chance, might snowball into a visible effect,
+ like slipping and injuring yourself. I will not count footsteps.
+ I will not count the way your muscles contract and relax unless
+ they are a factor in the success of the shower. Therefore,
+ I will assume the shower is successful; that is, complete.
+
+ Second, I will limit the impact of the shower to external
+ physical cleanliness. I will not count psychological effects,
+ nor will I count the effect (if any) it has on the movement
+ of red blood cells inside of you, whether they hit the walls
+ of your vessels in certain ways as they squeeze through, nor will
+ I pretend that such movement affects the process of showering.
+ If I count it, there will be infinite outcomes, most of which have
+ no real discernible value, because the useful data is cleanliness.
+ I will assume that the way soap bubbles on your skin has no impact,
+ because there are infinite manners in which the bubbles will appear,
+ if they appear at all in the foam. I will count, however, whether
+ the soap covers every picometer of your skin. If not, then how much
+ of the skin it touches. This is important in assessing the totality
+ of the cleansing.
+
+ With that out of the way, because there are infinite numbers, there
+ are infinite "levels" of cleanliness. The percentage can be any number
+ between 0 and 100. However, some people don't use soap or shampoo
+ at all. Sometimes, people have a quick shower to rinse off sweat and
+ nothing else. In cases like this, and in all cases really, it may be
+ more useful to measure the change in cleanliness level. In other
+ words, we will count how much cleaner you got. This should exclude
+ obvious extreme cases like not turning on the water. A shower must
+ constitute of water at the very least, and the water must touch you.
+ Usage of soap is not a must, but another factor in cleanliness.
+ A shower using a bit of soap cleans more than a shower without any.
+ That translates meaningfully into the calculation and measurement.
+
+ To reduce the number of outcomes from infinite to usable, we can
+ define ranges and conditions. For example, we can produce a binary
+ of "clean" and "not clean" based on a threshold of cleanliness. If your
+ cleanliness at the end of the shower is above a certain percentage, you
+ are clean. An issue with this is that you may have been clean before the
+ shower too, so this does not show the effect of the shower. We can thus
+ return to the change-measuring method: a shower is effective if its
+ net cleanliness change meets the amount required by the showerer. This
+ gives room for relative usefulness of the shower. Someone entering the
+ shower might not be looking for the deepest cleanse. I disagree with
+ that personally, but that does not matter. \ No newline at end of file